Immigrants from Austria vs Bhutanese Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Immigrants from Austria
Bhutanese
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Immigrants from Austria
Bhutanese
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Austria vs Bhutanese Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,584,591 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,770,052 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 2.9%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Austria | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.74% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 24.3% | 32.4% |
| Range | 23.6% | 31.4% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 10.2% |
| Median | 7.3% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Austria and Bhutanese by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Austria are Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Turkish (9.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Zimbabwean (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Czech (9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |