Turkish vs Apache Female Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
 Apache
 Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Turks
Apache
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Apache Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,999,825 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413 and weighted average of 19.2%, a difference of 61.7%.
 
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Apache | 
| Minimum | 0.67% | 4.1% | 
| Maximum | 22.9% | 81.8% | 
| Range | 22.2% | 77.7% | 
| Mean | 10.0% | 31.0% | 
| Median | 9.8% | 24.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 16.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 40.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 24.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 19.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 19.3% | 
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% | 
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% | 
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% | 
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% | 
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% | 
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% | 
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% | 
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% | 
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% | 
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Apache by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Native/Alaskan (19.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (19.3%, a difference of 0.60%), Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and Black/African American (18.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% | 
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% | 
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |