Crow vs Apache Female Poverty
COMPARE
Crow
Apache
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Crow
Apache
22.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Apache Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,198,506 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 22.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,999,825 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413 and weighted average of 19.2%, a difference of 15.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Apache |
| Minimum | 5.6% | 4.1% |
| Maximum | 50.2% | 81.8% |
| Range | 44.6% | 77.7% |
| Mean | 26.8% | 31.0% |
| Median | 23.4% | 24.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.0% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.0% | 24.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 19.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 19.3% |
Demographics Similar to Crow and Apache by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yup'ik (21.5%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.2%), Hopi (21.0%, a difference of 5.6%), Sioux (20.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and Lumbee (23.5%, a difference of 6.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Native/Alaskan (19.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (19.3%, a difference of 0.60%), Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and Black/African American (18.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |