Turkish vs Iranian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Iranian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Turks
Iranians
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Iranian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,618,692 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Iranian |
| Minimum | 0.67% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 22.9% | 31.0% |
| Range | 22.2% | 27.5% |
| Mean | 10.0% | 9.7% |
| Median | 9.8% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Iranians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Greek (11.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and Polish (11.7%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |