Turkish vs Estonian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Estonian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Turks
Estonians
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Estonian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,486,564 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 1.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Estonian |
Minimum | 0.67% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 40.1% |
Range | 22.2% | 38.2% |
Mean | 10.0% | 11.7% |
Median | 9.8% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Estonians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Immigrants from Serbia (12.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |