Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from China Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,935,416 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,197,331 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Indian (Asian)	Immigrants from China
Minimum	1.7%	1.1%
Maximum	16.6%	20.0%
Range	14.9%	18.9%
Mean	5.3%	5.8%
Median	4.3%	4.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.3%	3.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.5%	6.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.2%	2.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.9%	3.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.9%	3.7%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are White/Caucasian (4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Romanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.35%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Indonesia	95.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.8%
Taiwanese	94.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.8%
Celtics	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.8%
Kenyans	94.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.8%
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%
Romanians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	92.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.8%
Egyptians	92.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Palestinians	91.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Hmong (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	89.4 /100 \| #135	Excellent 4.9%
Immigrants \| Hungary	88.7 /100 \| #136	Excellent 4.9%
Guamanians/Chamorros	86.5 /100 \| #137	Excellent 4.9%
Chileans	86.0 /100 \| #138	Excellent 4.9%
German Russians	85.1 /100 \| #139	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Portugal	84.8 /100 \| #140	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Brazil	84.6 /100 \| #141	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| China	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	83.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 5.0%
Hmong	83.2 /100 \| #144	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Spain	79.9 /100 \| #145	Good 5.0%
Mongolians	79.8 /100 \| #146	Good 5.0%
Syrians	78.7 /100 \| #147	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Russia	78.7 /100 \| #148	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	78.6 /100 \| #149	Good 5.0%