Tongan vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,697,029 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,530,737 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Tongan	Immigrants from Southern Europe
Minimum	0.80%	1.6%
Maximum	18.0%	17.2%
Range	17.2%	15.6%
Mean	5.5%	5.5%
Median	4.4%	4.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.3%	3.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.4%	5.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.2%	1.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.3%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.3%	3.1%

Demographics Similar to Tongans and Immigrants from Southern Europe by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Pakistani (4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Bolivia (4.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (4.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Laotian (4.7%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe are Indian (Asian) (4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), White/Caucasian (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Romanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.43%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| France	96.9 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Germany	96.8 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 4.7%
Laotians	96.6 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	96.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	96.2 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 4.7%
Pakistanis	96.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 4.7%
Tongans	95.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Nepal	95.9 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	95.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.8%
Taiwanese	94.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.8%
Celtics	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.8%
Kenyans	94.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.8%
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%
Romanians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	92.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.8%