Subsaharan African vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Alaskan Athabascan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Alaskan Athabascans
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,469,907 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 9.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 0.38% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 69.8% | 69.0% |
Range | 69.4% | 68.2% |
Mean | 20.8% | 21.7% |
Median | 16.0% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.9% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.4% | 28.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 16.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 16.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |