Subsaharan African vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Alaskan Athabascans
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,815,060 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 61.8%, a difference of 0.38%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 32.6% | 17.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.4% | 82.2% |
Mean | 62.5% | 59.5% |
Median | 61.7% | 59.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.0% | 50.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.6% | 67.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 16.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (61.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Ugandan (61.7%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |