Immigrants from Nigeria vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nigeria
Alaskan Athabascan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nigeria
Alaskan Athabascans
14.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,264,818 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.032 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 2.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nigeria | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 29.1% | 69.0% |
| Range | 25.2% | 68.2% |
| Mean | 14.0% | 21.7% |
| Median | 12.7% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 28.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nigeria and Alaskan Athabascans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nigeria are German Russian (14.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Ghanaian (14.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Eritrea (14.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Alaska Native (14.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and American (14.6%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
| German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |