Immigrants from Lebanon vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Alaskan Athabascan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Alaskan Athabascans
13.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
25.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,101,802 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 13.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 4.3%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lebanon | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 35.0% | 69.0% |
Range | 33.6% | 68.2% |
Mean | 13.1% | 21.7% |
Median | 11.0% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 28.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 16.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lebanon and Alaskan Athabascans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Immigrants from Uganda (13.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Arab (13.7%, a difference of 0.35%), South American Indian (13.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Spanish (13.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |