Immigrants from Somalia vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Somalia
Alaskan Athabascan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Somalia
Alaskan Athabascans
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Somalia vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,101,870 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Somalia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 18.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Somalia | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 56.1% | 69.0% |
| Range | 50.6% | 68.2% |
| Mean | 19.1% | 21.7% |
| Median | 17.0% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.1% | 28.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 16.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Somalia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Somalia are British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |