Immigrants from Panama vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Panama
Alaskan Athabascan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Panama
Alaskan Athabascans
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Panama vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,145,499 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 0.30%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Panama | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 30.5% | 69.0% |
| Range | 27.5% | 68.2% |
| Mean | 14.5% | 21.7% |
| Median | 13.7% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 28.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Panama and Alaskan Athabascans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |