Spanish American Indian vs Immigrants from Sudan Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Immigrants from Sudan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Immigrants from Sudan
14.2%
POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Immigrants from Sudan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,142,105 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,962,035 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.389 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 1.1%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Immigrants from Sudan |
Minimum | 7.3% | 0.75% |
Maximum | 48.0% | 40.5% |
Range | 40.7% | 39.8% |
Mean | 16.0% | 14.3% |
Median | 13.8% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians and Immigrants from Sudan by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (14.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (14.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Cree (14.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Potawatomi (14.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Nepalese (14.0%, a difference of 0.39%), Sudanese (14.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Liberian (14.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and Ecuadorian (14.0%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Ghanaians | 0.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.9% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 14.0% |
Salvadorans | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 14.0% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |
Cree | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 14.2% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |