Soviet Union vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
60.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,503,005 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,673,525 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.396 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 18.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
Minimum | 0.80% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 23.2% | 26.4% |
Range | 22.4% | 24.4% |
Mean | 9.1% | 11.9% |
Median | 8.4% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 14.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.3% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |