Soviet Union vs Chinese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Chinese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Chinese
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Chinese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,588 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 0.28%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 4.6% | 6.4% |
| Range | 4.2% | 6.0% |
| Mean | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Median | 2.0% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.72% | 0.78% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.86% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.85% | 1.00% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Chinese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Poland (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Lithuanian (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Western Asia (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Palestinians | 98.3 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Paraguayans | 98.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 96.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.1% |