South American Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
South American Indian
Immigrants from Oceania
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
South American Indians
Immigrants from Oceania
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
74.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,615,516 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,448,754 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 0.12%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 2.6% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 62.5% |
Range | 97.4% | 56.9% |
Mean | 31.1% | 27.0% |
Median | 25.0% | 21.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.4% | 19.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.7% | 37.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.3% | 18.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.0% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.6% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Immigrants from Oceania by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |