Salvadoran vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Zimbabwean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Salvadorans
Zimbabweans
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,655,447 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,185,827 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 25.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Salvadoran | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 50.9% | 21.7% |
| Range | 49.7% | 19.5% |
| Mean | 15.9% | 10.3% |
| Median | 14.9% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |