Puget Sound Salish vs Austrian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Austrian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Austrians
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
79.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
85.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Austrian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,841,624 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,015,533 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.381 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 0.69%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Austrian |
| Minimum | 8.6% | 14.3% |
| Maximum | 40.8% | 56.8% |
| Range | 32.2% | 42.4% |
| Mean | 20.9% | 31.8% |
| Median | 20.0% | 30.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.4% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 37.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 16.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and Austrians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Denmark (20.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |