Polish vs Chippewa In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Polish
Chippewa
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Poles
Chippewa
85.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
82.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Chippewa In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,917,844 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Poles and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.100 and weighted average of 85.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,016,348 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043 and weighted average of 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Chippewa |
Minimum | 37.5% | 26.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 62.5% | 73.9% |
Mean | 86.4% | 79.1% |
Median | 86.6% | 82.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 85.2% | 70.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 90.9% | 87.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 15.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 15.7% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Demographics Similar to Poles by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Lithuanian (85.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Poland (85.2%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Immigrants | Morocco | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Kenyans | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Poles | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 85.2% |
German Russians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Thais | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Puget Sound Salish (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), African (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Belize (82.9%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 82.9% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 82.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 82.9% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 82.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 82.9% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 82.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 82.8% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 82.7% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 82.7% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 82.6% |