Palestinian vs Portuguese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Portuguese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Portuguese
10.6%
MALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE POVERTY
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Portuguese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,357,204 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,699,764 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 0.56%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Palestinian | Portuguese |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 22.5% | 31.5% |
| Range | 22.1% | 30.0% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 10.9% |
| Median | 9.2% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Portuguese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Brazil (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Turkey (10.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Argentina (10.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Sri Lankan (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Laotian (10.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Albanian (10.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |