Nicaraguan vs Spanish American Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
Spanish American Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Nicaraguans
Spanish American Indians
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nicaraguan vs Spanish American Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,867,505 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,039,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 1.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nicaraguan | Spanish American Indian |
Minimum | 7.8% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 41.4% | 80.0% |
Range | 33.6% | 73.5% |
Mean | 21.5% | 26.4% |
Median | 21.1% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.2% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.9% | 29.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans and Spanish American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are European (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |