Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Jordan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Jordan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Jordan
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
66.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Jordan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,119,087 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,872,287 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 25.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 6.9% | 25.3% |
Range | 5.9% | 23.5% |
Mean | 3.4% | 6.5% |
Median | 3.4% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.3% | 7.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Ethiopian (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |