Kenyan vs Czech Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Kenyan
Czech
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Kenyans
Czechs
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
46.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs Czech Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,254,696 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,282,128 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 1.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kenyan | Czech |
| Minimum | 6.1% | 6.8% |
| Maximum | 36.9% | 80.9% |
| Range | 30.8% | 74.1% |
| Mean | 22.4% | 29.6% |
| Median | 21.2% | 25.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 20.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.1% | 36.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 15.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 14.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 14.3% |
Demographics Similar to Kenyans and Czechs by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |