Kenyan vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Kenyan
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Kenyans
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,254,696 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,122,689 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 2.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kenyan | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
| Minimum | 6.1% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 36.9% | 52.0% |
| Range | 30.8% | 46.9% |
| Mean | 22.4% | 19.9% |
| Median | 21.2% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.1% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Kenyans and Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.36%), Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |