Swedish vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Swedish
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Swedes
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
77.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,559,813 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,122,689 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swedish | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
| Minimum | 7.9% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 52.0% |
| Range | 92.1% | 46.9% |
| Mean | 35.5% | 19.9% |
| Median | 26.8% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.1% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.5% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.9% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |