Irish vs Immigrants from Latvia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Irish
Immigrants from Latvia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Irish
Immigrants from Latvia
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Irish vs Immigrants from Latvia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,836,064 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,716,282 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Irish | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 20.7% |
| Range | 97.7% | 19.1% |
| Mean | 23.1% | 9.4% |
| Median | 12.6% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.6% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.9% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Irish and Immigrants from Latvia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Dutch (12.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from England (12.3%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |