Irish vs Australian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Irish
Australian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Irish
Australians
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Irish vs Australian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,836,064 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,990,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.88%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Irish | Australian |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.92% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 78.1% |
Range | 97.7% | 77.2% |
Mean | 23.1% | 14.9% |
Median | 12.6% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 15.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.6% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.9% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Irish and Australians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Dutch (12.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from England (12.3%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |