Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Whites/Caucasians
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,462,695 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 14.8%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 0.35% | 10.3% |
Maximum | 80.6% | 33.9% |
Range | 80.3% | 23.6% |
Mean | 14.7% | 16.7% |
Median | 13.7% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |