Immigrants from Norway vs New Zealander Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
New Zealander
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
New Zealanders
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
53.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs New Zealander Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,651,083 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.323 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,229,490 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.505 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 0.63%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 9.8% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 65.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 55.4% | 96.1% |
| Mean | 25.7% | 27.1% |
| Median | 21.2% | 21.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 29.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 20.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 19.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and New Zealanders by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |