Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Soviet Union Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Soviet Union
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Soviet Union
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
60.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Soviet Union Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,989,271 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,503,005 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.070%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 47.8% | 23.2% |
| Range | 46.7% | 22.4% |
| Mean | 13.8% | 9.1% |
| Median | 10.9% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa and Soviet Union by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.23%), White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Ethiopian (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |