Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Malaysia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Immigrants from Malaysia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Immigrants from Malaysia
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
64.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Malaysia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,989,271 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,921,131 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.54%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 47.8% | 37.1% |
Range | 46.7% | 35.8% |
Mean | 13.8% | 11.2% |
Median | 10.9% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 13.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Malaysia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.23%), White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Ethiopian (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |