Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Ethiopian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Ethiopian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Ethiopians
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Ethiopian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,989,271 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,096,222 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.30%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 47.8% | 28.0% |
| Range | 46.7% | 27.0% |
| Mean | 13.8% | 10.6% |
| Median | 10.9% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa and Ethiopians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.23%), White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Hungarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
| Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |