Immigrants from Liberia vs French American Indian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Liberia
French American Indian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Liberia
French American Indians
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Liberia vs French American Indian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,246,514 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,954,359 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 2.5%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Liberia | French American Indian |
Minimum | 3.0% | 4.1% |
Maximum | 40.3% | 36.3% |
Range | 37.2% | 32.2% |
Mean | 13.8% | 13.8% |
Median | 11.4% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 15.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia and French American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Mexican American Indian (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Ecuadorian (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Ghanaian (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (12.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |