Immigrants from Guyana vs Romanian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guyana
Romanian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Guyana
Romanians
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guyana vs Romanian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,633,406 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,651,231 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 24.9%.
![Immigrants from Guyana vs Romanian Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-poverty/immigrants-from-guyana-vs-romanians-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guyana | Romanian |
Minimum | 0.82% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 59.5% |
Range | 30.0% | 58.0% |
Mean | 14.1% | 17.9% |
Median | 13.7% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 22.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 14.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guyana by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guyana are Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |