English vs Romanian Female Poverty
COMPARE
English
Romanian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
English
Romanians
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Romanian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,145,061 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,651,231 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.63%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | English | Romanian |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 72.5% | 59.5% |
| Range | 72.2% | 58.0% |
| Mean | 17.3% | 17.9% |
| Median | 12.4% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.7% | 22.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to English and Romanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to English are Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |