Welsh vs Romanian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Welsh
Romanian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Welsh
Romanians
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Romanian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,858,131 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,651,231 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Romanian |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 59.5% |
| Range | 97.0% | 58.0% |
| Mean | 19.2% | 17.9% |
| Median | 13.5% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 22.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Romanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Puget Sound Salish (12.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |