Immigrants from Greece vs Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Greece
Immigrants from China
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Greece
Immigrants from China
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Greece vs Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,211,869 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Greece and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,922,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 18.1%, a difference of 0.68%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Greece | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 4.1% | 7.4% |
| Maximum | 30.3% | 33.3% |
| Range | 26.2% | 25.9% |
| Mean | 15.4% | 16.3% |
| Median | 16.1% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Greece and Immigrants from China by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Greece are Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |