Immigrants from Egypt vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Egypt
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Egypt
Whites/Caucasians
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Egypt vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,387,558 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 7.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Egypt | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 55.9% | 33.9% |
| Range | 55.1% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 16.7% |
| Median | 10.7% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.9% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Egypt by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |