Bulgarian vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Whites/Caucasians
11.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,544,553 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.773 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 20.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 0.25% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 53.6% | 33.9% |
| Range | 53.3% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 9.0% | 16.7% |
| Median | 8.5% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 0.89%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |