Spanish American Indian vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Whites/Caucasians
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,136,112 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 14.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Spanish American Indian | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 7.6% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 48.9% | 33.9% |
| Range | 41.2% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 16.7% |
| Median | 15.0% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |