Central American vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Central American
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Central Americans
Whites/Caucasians
16.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,924,730 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 19.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 33.9% |
| Range | 98.8% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 20.2% | 16.7% |
| Median | 16.9% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.2% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Bangladeshi (16.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |