Immigrants from Scotland vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Whites/Caucasians
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,374,584 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 16.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 17.7% | 33.9% |
| Range | 16.2% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 16.7% |
| Median | 9.5% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |