English vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
English
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
English
Whites/Caucasians
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,145,061 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 7.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | English | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 72.5% | 33.9% |
| Range | 72.2% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 17.3% | 16.7% |
| Median | 12.4% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.7% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to English by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to English are Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |