Immigrants from Australia vs Alsatian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,877,847 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.699 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,194,745 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.237 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 33.0%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Australia	Alsatian
Minimum	3.7%	2.1%
Maximum	100.0%	48.4%
Range	96.3%	46.3%
Mean	23.7%	21.1%
Median	13.0%	16.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.7%	11.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	32.7%	25.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	22.0%	14.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	23.4%	12.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	23.1%	12.6%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (14.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (14.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Scotland (14.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Korean (14.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Asia (14.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%
Swedes	99.7 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 13.7%
Maltese	99.7 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 13.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.6 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 13.8%
Russians	99.6 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 13.9%
Lithuanians	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.6 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.5 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 14.0%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.5 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 14.0%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.5 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 14.0%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.4 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 14.0%
Koreans	99.4 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.4 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.3 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 14.1%
Croatians	99.3 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 14.1%

Demographics Similar to Alsatians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Nepalese (18.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.17%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Ghanaians	1.4 /100 \| #229	Tragic 18.5%
Osage	1.3 /100 \| #230	Tragic 18.5%
Cree	1.3 /100 \| #231	Tragic 18.5%
Immigrants \| Sudan	1.1 /100 \| #232	Tragic 18.6%
Sudanese	1.1 /100 \| #233	Tragic 18.6%
Fijians	1.1 /100 \| #234	Tragic 18.6%
Nepalese	1.1 /100 \| #235	Tragic 18.6%
Alsatians	1.1 /100 \| #236	Tragic 18.6%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	1.0 /100 \| #237	Tragic 18.6%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	1.0 /100 \| #238	Tragic 18.7%
Marshallese	0.9 /100 \| #239	Tragic 18.7%
Nigerians	0.9 /100 \| #240	Tragic 18.7%
Americans	0.8 /100 \| #241	Tragic 18.8%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.7 /100 \| #242	Tragic 18.8%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	0.7 /100 \| #243	Tragic 18.8%