Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Hungarian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,792,725 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,414,008 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.563 and weighted average of 16.6%, a difference of 1.5%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Hungarian
Minimum	3.2%	0.46%
Maximum	42.0%	100.0%
Range	38.8%	99.5%
Mean	16.5%	31.4%
Median	15.1%	20.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.5%	13.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	18.2%	46.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.7%	32.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.1%	24.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.0%	24.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hungarians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Kenyan (16.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from the Azores (16.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Uganda (16.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Arab (16.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Morocco (16.8%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Lebanese (16.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Asia (16.6%, a difference of 0.11%), White/Caucasian (16.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Hawaiian (16.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Syria (16.6%, a difference of 0.21%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Afghans	62.3 /100 \| #172	Good 16.2%
Immigrants \| South America	55.1 /100 \| #173	Average 16.4%
Ethiopians	50.0 /100 \| #174	Average 16.5%
Lebanese	45.4 /100 \| #175	Average 16.6%
Hungarians	45.1 /100 \| #176	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	44.1 /100 \| #177	Average 16.6%
Whites/Caucasians	43.6 /100 \| #178	Average 16.6%
Hawaiians	43.4 /100 \| #179	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Syria	43.3 /100 \| #180	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Iraq	43.2 /100 \| #181	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	43.1 /100 \| #182	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Portugal	42.5 /100 \| #183	Average 16.6%
Scotch-Irish	39.6 /100 \| #184	Fair 16.7%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	35.6 /100 \| #185	Fair 16.7%
South American Indians	35.0 /100 \| #186	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Morocco	34.6 /100 \| #187	Fair 16.8%
Arabs	34.5 /100 \| #188	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	32.5 /100 \| #189	Fair 16.8%
Kenyans	32.3 /100 \| #190	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Azores	31.3 /100 \| #191	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Uganda	31.3 /100 \| #192	Fair 16.8%