Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,858,187 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 20.7%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Chickasaw
Minimum	2.4%	3.3%
Maximum	38.5%	100.0%
Range	36.2%	96.7%
Mean	15.8%	27.0%
Median	14.3%	23.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.0%	18.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	18.4%	30.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.4%	11.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.2%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.1%	15.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Ethiopia (16.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Tsimshian (16.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Uruguayan (16.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Costa Ricans	68.1 /100 \| #163	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Albania	67.9 /100 \| #164	Good 16.1%
Colombians	65.2 /100 \| #165	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	63.6 /100 \| #166	Good 16.2%
Afghans	55.4 /100 \| #167	Average 16.3%
South Americans	55.3 /100 \| #168	Average 16.3%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	53.6 /100 \| #169	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	51.7 /100 \| #170	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	51.3 /100 \| #171	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Colombia	50.8 /100 \| #172	Average 16.4%
Tsimshian	50.5 /100 \| #173	Average 16.4%
Uruguayans	50.0 /100 \| #174	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Syria	49.0 /100 \| #175	Average 16.5%
Whites/Caucasians	48.2 /100 \| #176	Average 16.5%
Ethiopians	47.8 /100 \| #177	Average 16.5%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Iroquois	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.6%
Guyanese	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.6%
Vietnamese	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.6%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.7%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 19.7%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 19.8%
Belizeans	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 19.9%
Jamaicans	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 20.0%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants \| West Indies	0.0 /100 \| #278	Tragic 20.0%