Hmong vs Guamanian/Chamorro Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Hmong
Guamanian/Chamorro
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Hmong
Guamanians/Chamorros
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
86.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Guamanian/Chamorro Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,678,157 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,186,731 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 0.79%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hmong | Guamanian/Chamorro |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 10.7% | 43.5% |
| Range | 10.2% | 42.0% |
| Mean | 4.7% | 8.7% |
| Median | 4.3% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong and Guamanians/Chamorros by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from China (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Chilean (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from China (5.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Soviet Union | 90.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
| German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |