Nonimmigrants vs Immigrants from Latin America Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Immigrants from Latin America
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Immigrants from Latin America
23.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
278th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs Immigrants from Latin America Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,693,652 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 23.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 541,789,164 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074 and weighted average of 23.7%, a difference of 0.53%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nonimmigrants | Immigrants from Latin America |
Minimum | 10.5% | 8.5% |
Maximum | 47.5% | 68.5% |
Range | 36.9% | 60.0% |
Mean | 21.2% | 23.7% |
Median | 20.7% | 23.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 21.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 26.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Latin America by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.51%), Guatemalan (23.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and German Russian (23.9%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |