Marshallese vs Immigrants from Latin America Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
Immigrants from Latin America
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Immigrants from Latin America
23.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Immigrants from Latin America Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,727,549 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.741 and weighted average of 23.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 541,789,164 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074 and weighted average of 23.7%, a difference of 1.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Marshallese | Immigrants from Latin America |
Minimum | 16.2% | 8.5% |
Maximum | 56.5% | 68.5% |
Range | 40.3% | 60.0% |
Mean | 28.7% | 23.7% |
Median | 25.2% | 23.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.6% | 21.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.8% | 26.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Marshallese and Immigrants from Latin America by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.51%), Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.53%), Guatemalan (23.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |